Internet Exposition, Visualization and
Assessment
Allen Klinger
University of
California, Los Angeles
4531-C Boelter Hall UCLA
Los Angeles CA
90095-1596 USA
This paper describes
ways to use today's technology to foster approaches to Mathematics through
inquiry, a means that stresses involvement, motivation, and informality. We
show how to create new materials as well as integrate past items composed by
authorities. Fundamentally we reflect that the internet supports new
kinds of tutorial exposition. Using them effectively means employing
technological methods to support follow-up.
A second aspect of an
expository style based on internet availability is the relative ease of
integrating still or animated images, and sounds, into a new tutorial. The
connectedness of knowledge is a pragmatic reality due to high computer
processing speeds and communication networks. These technologies support visual
and auditory information presentation. They in turn foster visualization in
reasoning, analysis and design.
Material posted to the
internet
becomes
a democratic force in this sense. Popularly available items are potentially
usable for informal education. The third topic involves methods to evaluate what
informal and formal learners know about topics, a necessity if information is
supplied outside an organizational framework. This means measuring
accomplishments. This can be done assigning highest scores to those
who honestly disclose what they know.
1. Topics and
Technology.
This section describes
using software tools and hardware infrastructure to disseminate a personal view
of Mathematics. Notation and style are substantial parts of ordinary
mathematical exposition. Nevertheless the widespread use of computer network
technology leads toward freedom to rethink those aspects. In fact having a
sense of modern computer technology may tend one neither toward approved
approaches of Mathematics nor those of Computer Science or Engineering. Instead
creating internet materials can be for one's own pleasure. In my case I've
taken a path of presenting knowledge in a form so that others can more readily
go forward.
The tradition of
teaching difficult concepts through card games, puzzles and riddles is well
established. It would be easy to list examples, even books: many volumes are
collections of them. But that is an informal manner of Mathematics education.
It stands in contrast to tomes on Algebra, Trigonometry, Calculus, etc.
Nevertheless the recurrent failure to create positive mathematical interest in
vast portions of a general population, one that is oriented toward gambling
games, means that there are needs. I assert here that today's technology gives
means to meet those needs. This begins with a program of exposition based on
the unique attributes of the internet. The attributes depend on such a wide
array of diverse technologies that even listing their main academic sources is
daunting. They certainly include Computer Science: data structures, networks, theory,
programming languages; as well as contemporary computer utilities: Macromedia's
Flash, the markup languages such as HTML, and media players such as Apple
QuickTime.
Based on inquiry and an
evolving sense of what troubles those individuals who dislike Math, I recommend
fractions as one fundamental area to investigate. For many of us our
understanding
of such a simple subject
might make this seem a foolish suggestion. Still connecting current
views
about the rigid equivalence between ratios and decimal equivalents, to
subtleties of thought that arise when one considers how the ancient Egyptians
would have divided nine loaves of bread among ten men, might lead to less
skepticism. Even that amount surely would decline if one considers the series
and parallel forms of adding two fractional resistors. [In
Electronics/Electrical Engineering/Technology, consider combining a half-Ohm
resistor and another of a third-Ohm.] Finally that same
"simple"
addition takes
on a completely different nature when calculating a baseball batting average (e.g., for a player who bats
one hit in three at bats on day one, and one in two at bats day two).
Two simple statements
give many (and gave me) difficulties. They both show the thesis of this paper:
simple things are deeply connected with Mathematical knowledge. In short form
they are:
1. Can one divide a circular pizza pie into eight exactly
equal slices with just three straight line cuts?
2. Can you make twenty-four from three five's and a single one,
using the four arithmetic operations, plus, minus, times and divide, and
grouping by parentheses?
The first is
a tricky way of leading into a more advanced concept than is usually part of
elementary arithmetic (dividing) or geometry (circles, sectors). But the second
points to the relative discomfort most people have with fractions.
The internet supports
branching exposition. The markup language, HTML, is the fundamental enabling
technology. To use HTML one needs to become acquainted with some facts from a
file easily found with a search engine. Once that point has happened, it is
relatively easy to present related technical topics in linked files. A link or
pointer (called an anchor in HTML) is a location-finding datum. It supports
transition from one file to another. This is particularly important in
Mathematics exposition where students have difficulties due to unfamiliarity
with related topics. To a new learner Mathematics seems like a simultaneous
encounter with a very large number of disparate concepts.
Even more interesting,
the same technical features that allow branching also support viewing images,
hearing sounds, and displaying animations. Both the two questions above have
answers that are better shown than written about. That is true of many
concepts in Mathematics. Visuals that move people toward understanding can be
very powerful. That is true even when a visual represents a special case, not
the general instance. An instance from geometry is a not-equal-side pentagon.
It leads to ideas about regular (equal-length sides) shapes. One from
numeration comes from showing six different representations for quantity five.
This can be done using sticks, distinguishing a fifth-vertical-bar element by
some means (crossing the others, augmenting the ordinary width), mimicking the
shape of a hand, arranging five stones (both linearly to fourth, and as the
corners of a square), and joining stones by a line in the sand to get a modern
number sign. Finally, the sticks/stones and Roman/Arabic forms lead to showing
how tallying takes place in different cultures. That permits showing images
that can connect with people who aren't in the majority groups nor oriented to
conventional academic curricula.
The visionary 1945 paper
by Vannevar Bush introduced the notion of knowledge as an interconnected set.
The technical notion he innovated in "As We May Think," is of linkages or
simply links from one topic to another. That idea became the essence of
computer programming where a link today is also sometimes called a pointer (see
e.g., the seminal work by Knuth or the Klinger encyclopedia article listed
below). Thought about what interconnected or linked ideas represent is well
expressed in the related term, hyperlink or hypertext. There is a worthwhile
article that expressed technical realities that now are solidly entrenched
through the proliferation of the internet. A survey article published in 1987
by Jeff Conklin in an engineering publication, expresses the wonderful reality
that is upon us today when we consider internet exposition. We will see that
there are tools and means for making evident the connections of Mathematical
material to History, Culture, Art, Music, and other subjects, without
compromising its clarity or quality.
The truly
remarkable thing about current software and computer hardware is that they are
a technological means for conveying many concepts through animations. (See Software
within References.)
There are many differences between exposition based on the internet and
associated software technologies, and that in books and journals. For instance,
the internet easily enables displaying a multicultural view of quantitative
relationships. For example, although the Greek culture gave rise to the modern
concept of Mathematics, very few are aware that their knowledge included the
concept of limit. A book reference (Kasner & Newman) makes it visually
apparent that this too was known in the Greek world.
When reviewing work of
Richard Feynmann, Stanislaw Ulam or Solomon Golomb, vis-a-vis their
contributions to the scientific history of the twentieth century, visual
thinking certainly has played an important role. The understanding of quantum electro-dynamic (particle
behavior) phenomena through Feynmann diagrams, the basic concept of the
hydrogen or fusion bomb (see the appended excerpt from http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/peopleevents/pandeAMEX74.html),
and the key ideas supporting transmitting images from spacecraft to earth came
out of Mathematical innovation by a Physicist and two Electrical Engineers
based on visualization. The role visualization plays is one theme of James
Adams, in his book. His work began with a Mechanical Engineering design course
at Stanford University. [The nine-dot four-line problem he presents in the book
generated the phrase
"think outside the box."] Internet exposition can place
the average individual in front of problems that require some form of visual
analysis.
Some would protest that
this is "too complicated," or that
"problems form the widespread
aversion to Mathematics,"
The immediate counter to that is the popularity of
gambling: Las Vegas, government-sponsored lotteries, and casino activities.
Games with cards, boards, and other formats, are seen as entertainments, not
drudgery. Architects ranging from Escher to others known more from their
residential or public building designs, or their theoretical contributions as
in the case of Christopher Alexander, are of widespread interest and their
designs (see Schindler's house number 175), images, and books sought after.
Both architects and
engineers work in the real world: they apply knowledge to make things.
The two fields value
models if useable/useful, but are ready to discard them when they are seen to
be unhelpful. Schindler discarded the notion of isolated characters for
numbers. He created a house number sign having small segments connecting two
offset horizontal bars. The assemblage represents the three numbers 175.
Schindler substituted usefulness for conventional numbers. That same process is
clearly involved when calculating the addition of two fractions, either in
sports statistics ["total successes" divided by "total trials"] or the familiar
to Electrical Engineers formula for the parallel combination of two resistances
(see appendix). So considering these two means and the standard method for
fraction addition, there are really three valid ways.
For more than sixty years there has been a
remarkably successful methodology for determining exactly what individuals
know. A triangle with distinguished vertices, edge midpoints, edge
quarter-distances, and center is one useful adjunct. (See the FIE paper for
associated numerical weights, their derivation, and its application.) The
triangle is a visual presentation of thirteen responses to three alternative
completions of a statement. The non-vertex points represent partial knowledge.
The triangle mid-point signifies
"nothing known". [Emir Shuford posted to the
web many papers concerning this technology. James Bruno first communicated
using discrete points with an alphabetic labeling, and essentially the relative
weights or value of answers at all thirteen of the triangle points discussed in
an appendix of the following reference
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/csd_report.html.]
The paper http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/csd_report.html
gives detail about using the thirteen-response system (see figure or http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/tri.jpg)
in a UCLA graduate course: it has been used in first year, and senior courses
as well. The following three questions illustrate how statements can be
composed that require students to examine their knowledge or work out a problem
solution (in order to do better than guess an answer). The five shown below
examined basic ability in Mathematics. To see the overall potential of these
assessment tools consider new web-expository material [http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/size.html]
introducing exponentiation and factorial. Three examples follow showing how I
use three possible completions to a given statement, in a way that rewards only
those who truly know a mathematical topic.
1. When two
quantities, say a and b, are compared, we write a is greater than b (or
a is more than b) as: a > b. Indicate which statement is true:
(a) 1/103 > 1/10-3 (b)
103 > 1/10-3 (c)
103 > 10-3
2. For the given pair of equations
which is true about the variables x and y ?
2x + 3y = 2; 6x
+ y = 12
(a) x and y have the
same sign. (b) x and y are whole
numbers. (c)
x > y.
3. In four births, which is most probable:
a) Two male, two female. b) Three of one sex; one
of the other. c)
All four the same sex.
Today very powerful
computer software tools exist that implement mathematical notation, knowledge,
and procedures (APL, Mathematica, Maple, etc.). Notwithstanding their
availability, the tendency is for fewer individuals seeking out Mathematics as
a source of basic knowledge. Going beyond the traditional educational
infrastructure of books and lectures can use technology to disseminate a
personal view of Mathematics. Instead of loading people with notation their
natural curious/inquisitive nature can be tapped. This can help more
individuals to readily go forward and pursue Mathematics. Today in the United
States Computer Science graduating seniors are hesitant to express fundamental
notions in their field to their peers. They avoid showing interest in coding,
modulo, and many other simple computational issues. Nevertheless they are
outstanding in their general ability to absorb Mathematical ideas. The general
population has been shut out more thoroughly from access to Mathematics.
Internet exposition can help both populations advance.
Fundamentally today most
economic opportunity goes to those who know how to work effectively with
information technology. Mathematical thought is at the heart of that subject.
Internet exposition has the ability to break through the habit of not wanting
to think about Mathematics. Visual means are at the center of the communication
difficulties that cause general individuals to resist continued learning. Using
the internet to show visuals or to lead people through inter-related ideas by
using links is a means for educating the many to work with modern technology.
Assessing what has been learned by informal review of web material can be made
a step toward qualification for admission to study about a future in one of a
variety of technical careers.
Bush, Vannevar, "As We May Think," Atlantic
Monthly, 176-1, July 1945, 101-108. Available from
http://www.theatlantic.com/unbound/flashbks/computer/bushf.htm
Conklin, Jeff, " Hypertext:
An Introduction and Survey,"
IEEE Computer, 20-9 (1987),
17-41.
Golomb, Solomon W., Polyominoes [with more
than 190 diagrams by Warren Lushbaugh, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1965],
Second Edition, Princeton NJ: Princeton Univ. Press, 1994.
Ulam, S. M., Adventures of a
Mathematician, Berkeley CA: Univ. of Calif. Press, 1991.
Klinger, Allen, Human Computer
Interactive Systems, NY: Plenum Press, 1991.
Alexander, Christopher, et. al., A Pattern Language: Towns,
Buildings, Construction,
Oxford Univ. Press, 1977.
Klinger, A., and Salingaros, N.,
"A Pattern Measure," Environment and Planning B: Planning and
Design 2000, 27-4, July 2000, 537-547.
Klinger, Allen, "Training and
Thinking," The Tau Beta Pi Bulletin, LXXV-3, March
2002, 3-5.
Klinger, Allen,
"Experimental
Validation of Learning Accomplishment,"
Proc. Frontiers in Education, 1997.
Klinger, Allen, Finelli, Cynthia
J. and Budny, Dan D., "Improving
the Classroom Environment,"
Proc. Frontiers in Education, 1999.
Finelli, Cynthia J., Klinger, Allen,
and Budney, Dan D.,
"Strategies for Improving the Classroom Environment,"
ASEE
J. of Engineeering Education (invited), Oct. 2001, 90-4, 491-498.
Appendix
A
Corin Anderson http://www.the4cs.com/~corin/motm/stan_ulam.html
Public Broadcasting System (PBS)
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/peopleevents/pandeAMEX74.html
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger Basic
Starting Point
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/csd_report.html Assessment
Paper Technical Report
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/size.html Expository:
Factorial, Exponentiation
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/blocks.html Expository:
Stimulate Thinking
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/math.html Bibliographical
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/pizza1.jpg
Problem
1 Solutions.*
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image005.gif
Greek
Visual Showing Limit**
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image001.gif
Non-equal-side
Five-edged Shape.
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image002.jpg
Sticks, Stones, Six Five Representations#
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image004.jpg
Tally In Three Cultures#
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image006.gif
Stanislaw Ulam^
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image008.jpg
Schindler's 175 Number
Sign
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image010.jpg
Fraction Addition and
Electric Circuits
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger//Internet_Exposition_6_21__files/image011.gif
Fourteen-Faced Solid
http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~klinger/tri.jpg Thirteen
Responses, Three Statements@
President
Truman announced in January 1950 that the United States was about to embark on
an all-out effort to develop a hydrogen bomb, Ulam began calculating whether
physicist Edward Teller's design "would work."
Ultimately, Ulam and a fellow mathematician Cornelius
Everett concluded that Teller's model "would never work." ... But a year later
Ulam accidentally came up with a new scheme that would prove to be a
breakthrough, and he reluctantly took it to Teller. Teller recognized that,
though there were problems with the idea, Ulam had hit on the solution.
Together the two men converted it into a design for the superbomb that everyone
at Los Alamos immediately recognized would work.
Their plan was to place an atom bomb inside a heavy shell that would also contain a capsule of hydrogen fuel. When the atom bomb exploded, in the fraction of a second before the whole assembly blew itself apart, the shell would confine the radiation from the atomic blast long enough to heat and compress the hydrogen fuel, setting off a fusion reaction. ... Ulam's idea was the use of material surrounding the fuel capsule that would magnify the energy of the radiation.
Decades
later physicist Hans Bethe wrote: "The new concept was to me, who had been
rather closely associated with the program, about as surprising as the
discovery of fission had been to physicists in 1939"[Comment: instructors
can lead pupils toward the penultimate paragraph image, and the importance of visualization
by using this and other web-materials.]
Series - R =
R1 + R2 (1a)
Parallel
- Apply
(1) noting that the same electric potential E goes across the total resistance
R and also each of the two parts, R1 and R2. Since the
current I divides, it equals I1 + I2,
implying:: E = I * R =
(I1 + I2) * R
= I1 * R1 (2)
E = I * R =
(I1 + I2) * R
= I2 * R2 (3)
From algebraic manipulation of the rightmost
equalities of (2) and (3) aided by substituting I for (I1 + I2), and
replacing I2 by (I - I1), one finds a solution of the two
equations for R or 1/R:
R = 1/[(1/ R1) + (1/ R2)] (4)
1/R =
(1/ R1) + (1/ R2) (5)
The following steps lead
to these results.
(2) -> R =
[I1 * R1]/[ I1 + I2] (2)
(3) -> R =
[I2 * R2]/[ I1 + I2] =
[(I - I1)/I] * R2 (3)
Substituting (2) in
(3) and solution of the result for R yields (4) and (5).
Multiplying (4) by R1* R2 yields
the parallel resistance formula:
R =
[R1 * R2]/[R1 + R2]/ (1b)
Visuals support the text exposition of these three themes. Seven appear as supplements below. They are:
image001.gif Figure 1. Five-Sided Shape
image002.jpg Figure 2.
Six Representations of Quantity Five
image004.jpg Figure 3. Three Representations of Tallying the First Five Quantities
image005.gif Figure 4. Nested
Regular Polygons With Inscribed Circles
image010.jpg Figure
5 Sports and Electric
Resistance Fraction Addition
image011.gif Figure
6. Fourteen Faces and Thirteen Points on Three Planes
image012.jpg Figure
7. Thirteen Responses to Three Statement
Completions
Creation of the visual
items was often through some assistance of others. The image * was drawn by
Gavin Wu. The image ** is scanned from Kasner & Newman. The # images were
significantly improved through the efforts of Yu-Chian Tseng. The ^ drawing of
Ulam is from his autobiography's cover courtesy of Corin
Anderson, and attributed to Zygmund Menkes. The information in @ is the
original notion of James Bruno.