On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations
Fan Yin, Zhouxing Shi, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Kai-Wei Chang, in ACL, 2022.
Download the full text
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a variety of post-hoc interpretations that aim to uncover how natural language processing (NLP) models make predictions. Despite the surge of new interpretation methods, it remains an open problem how to define and quantitatively measure the faithfulness of interpretations, i.e., to what extent interpretations reflect the reasoning process by a model. We propose two new criteria, sensitivity and stability, that provide complementary notions of faithfulness to the existed removal-based criteria. Our results show that the conclusion for how faithful interpretations are could vary substantially based on different notions. Motivated by the desiderata of sensitivity and stability, we introduce a new class of interpretation methods that adopt techniques from adversarial robustness. Empirical results show that our proposed methods are effective under the new criteria and overcome limitations of gradient-based methods on removal-based criteria. Besides text classification, we also apply interpretation methods and metrics to dependency parsing. Our results shed light on understanding the diverse set of interpretations.
Bib Entry
@inproceedings{yin2022on,
title = {On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations},
author = {Yin, Fan and Shi, Zhouxing and Hsieh, Cho-Jui and Chang, Kai-Wei},
booktitle = {ACL},
year = {2022}
}
Related Publications
-
On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations
Fan Yin, Zhouxing Shi, Cho-Jui Hsieh, and Kai-Wei Chang, in ACL, 2022.
Full Text Abstract BibTeX DetailsDetailsRecent years have witnessed the emergence of a variety of post-hoc interpretations that aim to uncover how natural language processing (NLP) models make predictions. Despite the surge of new interpretation methods, it remains an open problem how to define and quantitatively measure the faithfulness of interpretations, i.e., to what extent interpretations reflect the reasoning process by a model. We propose two new criteria, sensitivity and stability, that provide complementary notions of faithfulness to the existed removal-based criteria. Our results show that the conclusion for how faithful interpretations are could vary substantially based on different notions. Motivated by the desiderata of sensitivity and stability, we introduce a new class of interpretation methods that adopt techniques from adversarial robustness. Empirical results show that our proposed methods are effective under the new criteria and overcome limitations of gradient-based methods on removal-based criteria. Besides text classification, we also apply interpretation methods and metrics to dependency parsing. Our results shed light on understanding the diverse set of interpretations.
@inproceedings{yin2022on, title = {On the Sensitivity and Stability of Model Interpretations}, author = {Yin, Fan and Shi, Zhouxing and Hsieh, Cho-Jui and Chang, Kai-Wei}, booktitle = {ACL}, year = {2022} }